The humanistic approach is a term used in psychology involving the approaches which concentrate on all individuals and the uniqueness of every person. Humanism is a mental point of view that underscores the investigation of the entire individual.

Humanistic Therapists Approach:

  • Humanistic therapists take a look at human conduct through the eyes of the onlooker, as well as through the eyes of the individual doing this carrying on.
  • This implies personality is examined from the perspective of the individual’s subjective skill.
  • According to Rogers, the main concept of psychology is how people see and interpret occasions.

Impacts

The humanistic approach extended its impact all through the 1970s and 1980s. Its effect can be comprehended as far as three noteworthy areas:

  • It offered another set of qualities for drawing closer consideration of the human condition and human nature.
  • It offered an extended skyline of strategies for requests in the investigation of human conduct.
  • It offered a more extensive scope of more viable techniques in the expert routine of human conduct.

Assumptions

The humanistic approach originates with the assumptions that are given below

Free will:

  • Individuals have through and through freedom in will.
  • Personal agency is the humanistic term used for the activity of free will. So, we can’t determine all behaviours.
  • According to the humanistic approach, we can’t treat a person by his experience or what our society tells us to do. He has free will and can think and do whatever he wants but within legal limits.

Good people:

  • Naturally, people are good, using the potential for self-improvement on the off chance that they are given suitable circumstances.
  • The humanistic approach tells us that we should create a safe environment for all human being so they can develop their full potential.

Requirement:

  • People require self-actualization.
  • They are supposed to be self-aware of their surroundings and themselves.
  • If a person is not open to change he won’t be able to experience this. He needs to be open to the change.
  • A person with full desire of change will be able to feel the change.

Thinking:

  • Individuals use indistinct thinking to shield themselves.
  • For example with the help of rationalization, that is altering their genuine intentions to fit well in their self-idea.

Considerable study:

An appropriate perceptive of human conduct can be attained only by studying humans instead of animals.

Evidence

  • It is not taking into account scientific techniques as Rogers did not trust they were suitable, but rather on phenomenology, in which people state their conscious encounters.
  • Famous people like Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers were Great fans and founders of this approach.

History

Some points related to the history of the humanistic approach are given below:

  • Maslow in 1943 built up a progressive theory about human motivation.
  • Carl Rogers in 1946 published considerable parts of “client-centered therapy”.
  • In 1957-1958, at the welcome of Abraham Maslow and Clark Moustakas, two gatherings were done in Detroit along with therapists who were occupied with establishing an expert affiliation devoted to a more significant, more humanistic vision.
  • In 1962, this development was formally propelled as the “Association for Humanistic Psychology”.
  • The primary issue of the “Journal of Humanistic Psychology” showed up in the spring of 1961.

Methods

The following methods are used in a humanistic approach

  • Qualitative methods.
  • Contextual analysis.
  • Casual Interviews.
  • Q-Sort method.
  • Open-ended questions.

Strengths

Similar to each theory, some individuals observe the humanistic approach to deal with significance while others look at it for various characteristic defects. A portion of the strength of this approach is explained below

  • It moved the centre of conduct to the individual/entire individual instead of the unconscious personality, qualities, detectable conduct and so on.
  • Humanistic psychology fulfils the vast majority’s concept of what being human means since it values individual beliefs and self-satisfaction.
  • This qualitative information gives honest insight and more all-encompassing data into conduct.
  • It highlights the estimation of more individualistic and idiographic techniques for study.

Limitations

With good points, dependably come bad points, and in this theory case is the same. The main criticisms of this theory are given below

  • This approach overlooks biology
  • The concepts are unscientific and subjective and they can’t dispassionately measure self-actualisation.
  • Humanism disregards the unconscious personality.
  • Behaviorism leads to the analysis the human and animal conduct.
  • In this approach, qualitative information is hard to analyze.
  • Their faith in through and through freedom in the will is contrary to the deterministic laws in science.

Conclusion

The humanistic approach is usually connected to a moderately couple of zones of psychology contrasted with other approaches. In this manner, its commitments are constrained to zones, for example, therapy, personality, motivation and abnormality.

Humanism can pick up a superior understanding of an individual’s conduct using subjective strategies, for example, unstructured meetings. The approach additionally gave a more all-encompassing perspective of human conduct, rather than the reductionist side of science.